Identification difficulty = 4.
according to Ball & Morris, 20241
The larva of this species is not described, but other members of the genus are aphidophagous, associated mainly with trees, shrubs and tall herbs. Adults have been found where grassland, woodland and scrub occur together, and in woodland clearings where they visit flowers. They are reported to fly extremely rapidly (Speight, 1988)2.
The following plots show the number of unique records per week that were not reported to be of eggs, larvae or pupae.
Lower risk (Nationally scarce) - Ball & Morris, 20143.
This is primarily a south-eastern species. These is some evidence that its range is increasing but it remains largely associated with Surrey and Sussex. It is quite likely to have been overlooked and perhaps mistaken for E. nitidicollis.
The following plots show the Frescalo TFactor vs year and a map of the rescaled frequency (all records) for the species. For an explanation see here.
Ball, S., & Morris, R. (2024). Hoverflies of Britain and Ireland. WILDGuides (3rd ed.). Oxford: Princeton University Press. ↩
Speight, M. (1988). Syrphidae known from temperate Western Europe: potential additions to the fauna of Great Britain and Ireland and a provisional species list for N. France. Dipterists Digest (first series), 1, 2–35. ↩
Ball, S., & Morris, R. (2014). A review of the scarce and threatened flies of Great Britain. Part 6: Syrphidae. ( No. 9). Species status (pp. 1–130). Peterborough: JNCC. ↩