Previous Next

Sphegina elegans Schummel, 1843


Identification

Identification difficulty = 3. microscope_icon camera_icon_cross according to Ball & Morris, 20241

Synonymy

Sphegina kimakowiczii Strobl in Stubbs & Falk (1983)2.

Biology

The larva is found in accumulations of decaying sap under bark, usually in damp shaded places including under the bark of partially submerged logs in streams. Found in wet, shady woodland, generally in much wetter situations than is typical for S. clunipes and not usually far from water. Adults appear to stay in the shade of the canopy and very few records mention adults visiting flowers, even though they do regularly visit umbels such as Hemlock Water Dropwort Oenanthe croccata.

Flight period

The following plots show the number of unique records per week that were not reported to be of eggs, larvae or pupae. phenology

Distribution

Although both species are widely distributed throughout Britain, this species is much more patchily distributed than S. clunipes. It is undoubtedly much less abundant in Scotland where it is very infrequently encountered. Conversely, it appears to be the more frequent species at some localities in the West Midlands. dotmap

Trends

The following plots show the Frescalo TFactor vs year and a map of the rescaled frequency (all records) for the species. For an explanation see here. trend


  1. Ball, S., & Morris, R. (2024). Hoverflies of Britain and Ireland. WILDGuides (3rd ed.). Oxford: Princeton University Press. 

  2. Stubbs, A., & Falk, S. (1983). British Hoverflies: An Illustrated Identification Guide (1st ed.). Reading: BENHS.