Previous Next

Xanthogramma pedissequum (Harris, 1776)


Identification

Identification difficulty = 2. eyeball_icon camera_icon_question according to Ball & Morris, 20241

Biology

The larva has been found in the galleries of the black ant Lasius niger under a stone in a limestone quarry, in which the root aphid Forda formicaria was also present (Foster, 1987)2. Another record from a nest of the same ant species records the presence of a different root aphid, Trama sp. (Dixon, 1960)3. The species overwinters as a larva. It is found in flowery and grassy places including waste ground, disused railways, canal banks, gardens and woodland rides and edges. It does not show such a strong preference for calcareous localities as X. citrofasciatum, and there are a few records from acid grassland and wetlands.

Flight period

The following plots show the number of unique records per week that were not reported to be of eggs, larvae or pupae. phenology

Distribution

Local and usually scarce. About three times as many records have been submitted to the recording scheme for this species than for X. citrofasciatum, these being concentrated in southern England south of a line from the Severn to the Wash, and in South Wales. There are scattered records north of this, but it must be regarded as rare in North Wales and northern England. There is a confirmed record from a shingle island in the River Tay in central Scotland. dotmap

Trends

The following plots show the Frescalo TFactor vs year and a map of the rescaled frequency (all records) for the species. For an explanation see here. trend


  1. Ball, S., & Morris, R. (2024). Hoverflies of Britain and Ireland. WILDGuides (3rd ed.). Oxford: Princeton University Press. 

  2. Foster, A. (1987). Xanthogramma pedissequum (Harris) (Dipt.: Syrphidae) bred from a Lasius niger (L.) (Hym. Formicidae) nest. Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation, 99, 44–45. 

  3. Dixon, T. (1960). Key to and descriptions of the third instar larvae of some species of Syrphidae (Diptera) occurring in Britain. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 112, 435–379.